Having it all/writing it all

Miz Cather.

It is possible that I have spoken ill of literary theory here before, and I should probably allow that line of thinking to lie buried and dormant in the unsearchable nether regions of this blog. But I am currently reading Carolyn Heilbrun’s Writing a Woman’s Life, and though overrun at times with the kind of jargony blergh that characterizes virtually all academic writing, it is interesting and accessible.

Perhaps too it goes down easier because Heilbrun was also a novelist, who published detective stories under a pseudonym. Quoth she, “It has often occurred to me that all teachers of literature ought to have written and published a work of fiction in order to understand something fundamental about what they teach, but that is another matter.”

To me, it is the central matter. Getting lost in the artistic process is as close as I get to the ineffable, and the kind of exhaustive linguistic/contextual/historical/metaphorical unpacking that occurs as part of any theory-based examination of work just reduces it, for me, to something mechanical and spiritless. Which I realize is pretty rich coming from someone who’s agnostic at best.

One tendency in women authors that Heilbrun points to is for a mid-life shift: George Eliot, Willa Cather, and Virginia Woolf were all in their 30s when their first fiction was published. Of her own late-30s foray into mystery writing, Heilbrun says, “I believe now that I must have wanted, with extraordinary fervor, to create a space for myself.” She points to a lack of physical space for herself, and so the space she sought was in part psychic, a place her own in the midst of chaotic family life.

I have wondered many times in reading this book what Heilbrun would make of the current landscape of women writers and thinkers. Things have shifted a lot, in a way that one might suggest amounts to progress, with regards to the stories women tell in the fiction and nonfiction that we write, but also through demographic shifts, career planning in an attempt to “have it all,” etc.

Last week I ended up on STFU, Parents (equal parts funny and sad), the prototypical parent of which demonstrates a disturbing myopia about everything save his or her own in-the-moment experiences, usually with a very young child. I’m grateful that I am entering parenthood with my own psychic (and physical) space for writing. I know that writing has made me a better person, and I hope that continuing to make time for it will make me a better parent too (though of course it will take a while to find a new rhythm). The types of people STFU, Parents mocks would be in hysterics about an assertion like that. But they can, you know, STFU.

I had an appointment with my fabulous dermatologist yesterday. She told me that although she knew what altruism was as a concept, she never truly understood it until she was a parent. She told me that when she was my age, she had expected that her contribution to the world would be as a physician, but that now, older, she sees that her contribution is her children. I am so accustomed to my day-to-day life being consumed by small chattery and babble that it was hard to formulate anything even close to a thoughtful and sincere response. But I was really moved by her perspective, and I hope she noticed.

Advertisements

2 responses to “Having it all/writing it all

  1. I don’t think it’s mock-worthy for you to say that writing about your thoughts and experiences makes you a better person. That’s one of the reasons I never post anything from personal websites / blogs — everyone should have the right to carve out their own pocket of the Internet. My site is strictly about oversharing on social media / more public forums. Having a blog dedicated to one’s thoughtful writing is just the antidote I recommend to parents who tend to overshare. Just wanted to pass along that message! 🙂

    – B.

  2. Hey, thanks for commenting! I think I did a lousy job of expressing my point though…I meant to say that the type of parents you pillory (the mommyjackers of the world) would be apt to mock my desire to carve out time to write as delusional/not going to happen…and they might be right, in the short-term. Thanks for providing ongoing amusement. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s